Читать «За секунду до: как мозг конструирует будущее, которое становится настоящим» онлайн
Дэниел Йон
Страница 68 из 73
81
Cook J. L., Blakemore S. J., Press C. Atypical basic movement kinematics in autism spectrum conditions // Brain. 2013. Vol. 136. Pp. 2816–2824.
82
Milton D. E. M. On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’ // Disability & Society. 2012. Vol. 27. Pp. 883–887.
83
Edey R. et al. Interaction takes two: typical adults exhibit mind-blindness towards those with autism spectrum disorder // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2016. Vol. 125. Pp. 879–885.
84
Heyes C. Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking. Harvard University Press, 2018.
85
Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps // Neuron. 2007. Vol. 56. Pp. 384–398; Dehaene S., Cohen L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2011. Vol. 15. Pp. 254–262.
86
Woo B. M., Mitchell J. P. Simulation: a strategy for mindreading similar but not dissimilar others? // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 90. P. 104000.
87
Northoff G. et al. Self-referential processing in our brain — a meta-analysis of imaging studies of the self // Neuroimage. 2006. Vol. 31. Pp. 440–457; Gallagher H. L., Frith C. D. Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003. Vol. 7. Pp. 77–83.
88
Mitchell J. P., Macrae C. N., Banaji M. R. Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others // Neuron 2006. Vol. 18. Pp. 655–663.
89
Ashton M. C. et al. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 86. Pp. 356–366.
90
Lee K., Ashton M. C. Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100 // Assessment. 2018. Vol. 25. Pp. 543–556.
91
Conway J. R., Catmur C., Bird G. Understanding individual differences in theory of mind via representation of minds, not mental states // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2019. Vol. 26. Pp. 798–812.
92
Conway J. R. et al. Understanding how minds vary relates to skill in inferring mental states, personality, and intelligence // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2020. Vol. 149. Pp. 1032–1047.
93
Sevi L., Catmur C., Bird G. Emotion inference depends on trait inference and trait-emotion models // January Meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, University College London, 2023.
94
Zhao J. et al. Men also like shopping: reducing gender bias amplification using corpus-level constraints // arXiv. 2017. 1707.09457.
95
Hardt M., Price E., Srebro N. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning // arXiv. 2016. 1610.02413.
96
Abid A., Farooqi M., Zou J. Large language models associate Muslims with violence // Nature Machine Intelligence. 2021. Vol. 3. Pp. 461–463.
97
Vlasceanu M., Amodio D. M. Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2022. Vol. 119. Pp. e2204529119.
98
Hamilton M. C. Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: people = male, male = people // Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 15. Pp. 393–402.
99
Chandler — торговец свечами, draper — торговец тканью, peruker — изготовитель париков, lapidary — резчик драгоценных камней.
100
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Nobel Prize in Chemistry: press release. 2008 // nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2008/press-release/.
101
Sherwell P. The scientist, the jellyfish protein, and the Nobel prize that got away // The Daily Telegraph, 11 October 2008.
102
К чести Тсиена и Чалфи, они никогда не умалчивали о важнейшем вкладе Прэшера в их открытия, связанные с ЗФБ. Они даже оплатили Прэшеру и его жене самолет до Стокгольма, чтобы те посетили церемонию вручения Нобелевской премии.
103
Sorensen A. T. Bestseller lists and product variety // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 2007. Vol. 55. Pp. 715–738.
104
Bol T., de Vaan M., van de Rijt A. The Matthew effect in science funding // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2018. Vol. 115. Pp. 4887–4890.
105
Knotts J. D. et al. Subjective inflation: phenomenology’s get-rich-quick scheme // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 29. Pp. 49–55.
106
Feldman Hall O. et al. What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices // Cognition. 2012. Vol. 123. Pp. 434–441.
107
Fleming S. M, Dolan R. J., Frith C. D. Metacognition: computation, biology and function // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2012. Vol. 367. Pp. 1280–1286.
108
Bang D., Fleming S. M. Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2018. Vol. 115. Pp. 6082–6087; Fleming S. M. et al. Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure // Science. 2010. Vol. 329. Pp. 1541–1543; Fleming S. M., Hujgen J., Dolan R. J. Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision making // Journal of Neuroscience. 2012. Vol. 32. Pp. 6117–6125; Rounis E. et al. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal